Method in Hamlet’s Madness
Hamlets
madness, whether feigned or real, is a subject on which critics debated for
centuries, but we are almost sure that Shakespeare, the supreme artist, never
intended to present Hamlet as a madman, though he appears to be half mad or
verges on madness on several occasions. Early in the play Hamlet, having
received the Ghosts message, tells Horatio and Marcellus that he may find it
necessary to put on “an antic disposition” and behave in an eccentric manner.
Later Polonius, during his interview with Hamlet realizes that ‘though this is
madness, yet there is a method in’t’. Polonius remarks that a madman often hits
upon a kind of “pregnant replies “but when he leaves, Hamlet comments on him
saying, ‘These tedious old fools’. Thus there are enough evidences to show
Hamlet as a man of sound sense.
On
reading Hamlet we can guess that Hamlets insanity results from two causes on
his mother’s hasty remarriage and the Ghosts revelation of his uncle, Claudius
as the murderer of his father. Ophelia’s description of Hamlet to Polonius, the
conversation between Hamlet and Polonius in Act II, Sc II, his talk with
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, his talk with Ophelia in the nunnery scene, his
obscene talk, with her in the ‘play scene’ all prove him to be insane. His act of
killing Polonius also seems to be an act of madness. Finally his strange
behavior at Ophelia’s funeral is supposed to justify his madness which is
supported by the Queen.
However,
all the above evidences are not enough to prove Hamlets madness. There are more
evidences that his madness is feigned, for he acts normally when he chooses to
and in the presence of those with whom it is safe to do so. He talks most
rationally and shows great intellectual power in his conversation with Horatio.
He receives the players with kind courtesy and his refined behavior towards
them shows that he is not mad. His plan of enacting the play The Murder of
Gonzago proves his sanity and intellect. His suggestion to Horatio to mark the
King’s face and his exultation and future plans of avenging the murder, when
the King is proved guilty establish him as a sane man.
Further,
all the soliloquies uttered by Hamlet are coherent and logical and full of
wisdom and deep thinking. The thoughts he reveals in those soliloquies have a
universal appeal for their poetic quality and excellence of language. Through
them we come to know about his inner self and the ideas and feelings expressed
in them cannot be those of a madman.
To sum up, there are
plenty of abnormal behavior and actions in Hamlet, yet there are sufficient
evidences that Shakespeare never made his great tragic hero a madman. If Hamlet
were mad he would fail to think coherently, to understand his position clearly
and to decide his course of action rightly. Finally it is Shakespeare who
designed the character of his tragic hero in the way we find him and definitely
his aim was not to represent a madman as the hero.
No comments:
Post a Comment